OpenFaaS vs Kustomize: Key Differences & When to Use Each

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and metrics

Key Differences

Compare OpenFaaS and Kustomize across features, pricing, integrations, and community metrics. OpenFaaS / Kustomize.

Feature

OpenFaaS

Serverless

Kustomize

Configuration

Side-by-side comparison of developer tools
Serverless functions made simple
Kubernetes native configuration management
GitHub Stars
⭐ 26,196
⭐ 12,090
Contributors
👥 187
👥 466
Pricing
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
Languages
Go
Go
Features
  • Docker
  • Faas
  • Functions
  • Functions As A Service
  • Gitops
  • Hacktoberfest
  • K8s Sig Cli
Integrations
  • • kubernetes
  • • docker
  • • aws
  • • kubernetes
Momentum Score
13/100 (stable)
70/100 (stable)
Community Health
34/100 (needs-attention)
63/100 (moderate)
Maturity Index
27/100 (experimental)
41/100 (emerging)
Innovation Score
69/100 (progressive)
18/100 (traditional)
Risk Score (higher is safer)
25/100 (high)
44/100 (medium)
Developer Experience
91/100 (excellent)
68/100 (fair)
Links

OpenFaaS Strengths

  • ✓ More popular (26,196 stars)
  • ✓ More features (5 listed)

Kustomize Strengths

  • ✓ Larger community (466 contributors)

When to Use OpenFaaS vs Kustomize

Use OpenFaaS when its strengths align better with your stack and team needs, and choose Kustomize when its ecosystem, integrations, or cost profile is a better fit.

Data source: GitHub API

Last updated: 7/2/2026