OpenFaaS vs VictoriaMetrics: Key Differences & When to Use Each

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and metrics

Key Differences

Compare OpenFaaS and VictoriaMetrics across features, pricing, integrations, and community metrics. OpenFaaS / VictoriaMetrics.

Feature

OpenFaaS

Serverless

Side-by-side comparison of developer tools
Serverless functions made simple
Fast, cost-effective monitoring solution and time series database
GitHub Stars
⭐ 26,230
⭐ 17,616
Contributors
👥 187
👥 421
Pricing
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
Languages
Go
Go
Features
  • Docker
  • Faas
  • Functions
  • Functions As A Service
  • Gitops
  • Database
  • Grafana
  • Graphite
  • Influxdb
  • Kubernetes
Integrations
  • • kubernetes
  • • docker
  • • aws
  • • kubernetes
  • • prometheus
  • • grafana
Momentum Score
14/100 (stable)
55/100 (slowing)
Community Health
34/100 (needs-attention)
62/100 (moderate)
Maturity Index
27/100 (experimental)
36/100 (experimental)
Innovation Score
69/100 (progressive)
64/100 (progressive)
Risk Score (higher is safer)
25/100 (high)
43/100 (medium)
Developer Experience
90/100 (excellent)
36/100 (poor)
Links

OpenFaaS Strengths

  • ✓ More popular (26,230 stars)

VictoriaMetrics Strengths

  • ✓ Larger community (421 contributors)

When to Use OpenFaaS vs VictoriaMetrics

Use OpenFaaS when its strengths align better with your stack and team needs, and choose VictoriaMetrics when its ecosystem, integrations, or cost profile is a better fit.

Data source: GitHub API

Last updated: 8/30/2026