Grafana vs Loki: Key Differences & When to Use Each

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and metrics

Key Differences

Compare Grafana and Loki across features, pricing, integrations, and community metrics. Grafana / Loki.

Feature

Grafana

Monitoring

Loki

Monitoring

Side-by-side comparison of developer tools
The open and composable observability and data visualization platform
Like Prometheus, but for logs
GitHub Stars
⭐ 73,569
⭐ 28,136
Contributors
👥 3,006
👥 1,320
Pricing
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
Languages
TypeScript
Go
Features
  • Alerting
  • Analytics
  • Business Intelligence
  • Dashboard
  • Data Visualization
  • Cloudnative
  • Grafana
  • Hacktoberfest
  • Logging
  • Loki
Integrations
  • • prometheus
  • • grafana
  • • elasticsearch
  • • prometheus
  • • grafana
Momentum Score
94/100 (stable)
66/100 (stable)
Community Health
95/100 (excellent)
77/100 (good)
Maturity Index
90/100 (mature)
67/100 (growing)
Innovation Score
95/100 (pioneering)
83/100 (innovative)
Risk Score (higher is safer)
94/100 (minimal)
76/100 (minimal)
Developer Experience
80/100 (good)
54/100 (needs-improvement)
Links

Grafana Strengths

  • ✓ More popular (73,569 stars)
  • ✓ Larger community (3,006 contributors)

Loki Strengths

When to Use Grafana vs Loki

Use Grafana when its strengths align better with your stack and team needs, and choose Loki when its ecosystem, integrations, or cost profile is a better fit.

Data source: GitHub API

Last updated: 5/4/2026