Longhorn vs VictoriaMetrics: Key Differences & When to Use Each

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and metrics

Key Differences

Compare Longhorn and VictoriaMetrics across features, pricing, integrations, and community metrics. Longhorn / VictoriaMetrics.

Feature

Longhorn

Storage

Side-by-side comparison of developer tools
Distributed block storage for Kubernetes
Fast, cost-effective monitoring solution and time series database
GitHub Stars
⭐ 7,681
⭐ 16,935
Contributors
👥 157
👥 387
Pricing
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
Languages
Shell
Go
Features
  • Cncf
  • Distributed Systems
  • High Availability
  • K8s Sig Storage
  • Kubernetes
  • Database
  • Grafana
  • Graphite
  • Influxdb
  • Kubernetes
Integrations
  • • kubernetes
  • • kubernetes
  • • prometheus
  • • grafana
Momentum Score
47/100 (slowing)
58/100 (slowing)
Community Health
23/100 (needs-attention)
63/100 (moderate)
Maturity Index
18/100 (experimental)
38/100 (experimental)
Innovation Score
26/100 (traditional)
65/100 (progressive)
Risk Score (higher is safer)
22/100 (high)
36/100 (medium)
Developer Experience
24/100 (poor)
36/100 (poor)
Links

Longhorn Strengths

VictoriaMetrics Strengths

  • ✓ More popular (16,935 stars)
  • ✓ Larger community (387 contributors)

When to Use Longhorn vs VictoriaMetrics

Use Longhorn when its strengths align better with your stack and team needs, and choose VictoriaMetrics when its ecosystem, integrations, or cost profile is a better fit.

Data source: GitHub API

Last updated: 5/4/2026