Playwright vs Puppeteer: Key Differences & When to Use Each
Comprehensive side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and metrics
Key Differences
Compare Playwright and Puppeteer across features, pricing, integrations, and community metrics. Playwright / Puppeteer.
Feature
Playwright
Testing
Puppeteer
Testing
Side-by-side comparison of developer tools
Cross-browser web automation
Puppeteer is a JavaScript API for automating Chrome and Firefox browsers, allowing developers to perform headless browser testing and automation.
GitHub Stars
⭐ 92,079
⭐ No data available
Contributors
👥 771
👥 No data available
Pricing
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
✓ Free
Languages
TypeScript
JavaScript TypeScript
Features
- • Automation
- • Chrome
- • Chromium
- • E2e Testing
- • Electron
- • Headless browser automation
- • Cross-browser support for Chrome and Firefox
- • JavaScript API
- • Node.js integration
Integrations
No integrations listed
- • Chrome
- • Firefox
- • Node.js
Momentum Score
89/100Momentum898989
(decelerating)
6/100Momentum666
(stable)
Community Health
51/100Health515151
(developing)
7/100Health777
(needs-attention)
Maturity Index
71/100Maturity717171
(established)
6/100Maturity666
(experimental)
Innovation Score
75/100Innovation757575
(innovative)
7/100Innovation777
(traditional)
Risk Score (higher is safer)
61/100Risk616161
(low)
5/100Risk555
(high)
Developer Experience
68/100DX686868
(fair)
5/100DX555
(poor)
Links
Playwright Strengths
- ✓ More popular (92,079 stars)
- ✓ Larger community (771 contributors)
- ✓ More features (5 listed)
Puppeteer Strengths
When to Use Playwright vs Puppeteer
Use Playwright when its strengths align better with your stack and team needs, and choose Puppeteer when its ecosystem, integrations, or cost profile is a better fit.
Related comparisons
More Comparisons
Data source: GitHub API
Last updated: 7/2/2026