Rook vs VictoriaMetrics: Key Differences & When to Use Each

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and metrics

Key Differences

Compare Rook and VictoriaMetrics across features, pricing, integrations, and community metrics. Rook / VictoriaMetrics.

Feature

Rook

Storage

Side-by-side comparison of developer tools
Cloud-native storage orchestrator for Kubernetes
Fast, cost-effective monitoring solution and time series database
GitHub Stars
⭐ 13,486
⭐ 16,935
Contributors
👥 670
👥 387
Pricing
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
Languages
Go
Go
Features
  • Ceph
  • Cloud Native
  • Cncf
  • Docker
  • Etcd
  • Database
  • Grafana
  • Graphite
  • Influxdb
  • Kubernetes
Integrations
  • • kubernetes
  • • docker
  • • kubernetes
  • • prometheus
  • • grafana
Momentum Score
79/100 (stable)
58/100 (slowing)
Community Health
73/100 (good)
63/100 (moderate)
Maturity Index
50/100 (emerging)
38/100 (experimental)
Innovation Score
65/100 (progressive)
65/100 (progressive)
Risk Score (higher is safer)
53/100 (low)
36/100 (medium)
Developer Experience
95/100 (excellent)
36/100 (poor)
Links

Rook Strengths

  • ✓ Larger community (670 contributors)

VictoriaMetrics Strengths

  • ✓ More popular (16,935 stars)

When to Use Rook vs VictoriaMetrics

Use Rook when its strengths align better with your stack and team needs, and choose VictoriaMetrics when its ecosystem, integrations, or cost profile is a better fit.

Data source: GitHub API

Last updated: 5/4/2026