Tempo vs VictoriaMetrics: Key Differences & When to Use Each

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and metrics

Key Differences

Compare Tempo and VictoriaMetrics across features, pricing, integrations, and community metrics. Tempo / VictoriaMetrics.

Feature

Tempo

Monitoring

VictoriaMetrics

Monitoring

Side-by-side comparison of developer tools
Distributed tracing backend
Fast, cost-effective monitoring solution and time series database
GitHub Stars
⭐ 5,232
⭐ 16,935
Contributors
👥 299
👥 387
Pricing
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
Languages
Go
Go
Features
  • • Distributed Tracing
  • • Grafana
  • • Database
  • • Grafana
  • • Graphite
  • • Influxdb
  • • Kubernetes
Integrations
  • • grafana
  • • kubernetes
  • • prometheus
  • • grafana
Momentum Score
89/100 (slowing)
58/100 (slowing)
Community Health
30/100 (needs-attention)
63/100 (moderate)
Maturity Index
20/100 (experimental)
38/100 (experimental)
Innovation Score
13/100 (traditional)
65/100 (progressive)
Risk Score (higher is safer)
29/100 (high)
36/100 (medium)
Developer Experience
16/100 (poor)
36/100 (poor)
Links
🌐 Visit Website View on GitHub
🌐 Visit Website View on GitHub

Tempo Strengths

VictoriaMetrics Strengths

  • ✓ More popular (16,935 stars)
  • ✓ Larger community (387 contributors)
  • ✓ More features (5 listed)

When to Use Tempo vs VictoriaMetrics

Use Tempo when its strengths align better with your stack and team needs, and choose VictoriaMetrics when its ecosystem, integrations, or cost profile is a better fit.

Related comparisons

Tempo vs Grafana → VictoriaMetrics vs Grafana → Tempo vs Prometheus → VictoriaMetrics vs Prometheus → Tempo vs Loki → VictoriaMetrics vs Loki → Tempo vs Jaeger → VictoriaMetrics vs Jaeger → Tempo vs Zipkin → VictoriaMetrics vs Zipkin → Tempo vs Thanos → VictoriaMetrics vs Thanos →

More Comparisons

View Tempo → View VictoriaMetrics → Search More Tools →

Data source: GitHub API

Last updated: 5/4/2026