Fastify vs Tempo: Key Differences & When to Use Each

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and metrics

Key Differences

Compare Fastify and Tempo across features, pricing, integrations, and community metrics. Fastify / Tempo.

Feature

Fastify

Web Framework

Tempo

Monitoring

Side-by-side comparison of developer tools
Fast and low overhead web framework for Node.js
Distributed tracing backend
GitHub Stars
⭐ 37,058
⭐ 5,458
Contributors
👥 920
👥 308
Pricing
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
Languages
JavaScript
Go
Features
  • • Fastify
  • • Fastify Core
  • • Hacktoberfest
  • • Nodejs
  • • Performance
  • • Distributed Tracing
  • • Grafana
Integrations
No integrations listed
  • • grafana
Momentum Score
42/100 (slowing)
81/100 (slowing)
Community Health
62/100 (moderate)
34/100 (needs-attention)
Maturity Index
59/100 (growing)
21/100 (experimental)
Innovation Score
64/100 (progressive)
14/100 (traditional)
Risk Score (higher is safer)
67/100 (low)
29/100 (high)
Developer Experience
68/100 (fair)
16/100 (poor)
Links
🌐 Visit Website View on GitHub
🌐 Visit Website View on GitHub

Fastify Strengths

  • ✓ More popular (37,058 stars)
  • ✓ Larger community (920 contributors)
  • ✓ More features (5 listed)

Tempo Strengths

When to Use Fastify vs Tempo

Use Fastify when its strengths align better with your stack and team needs, and choose Tempo when its ecosystem, integrations, or cost profile is a better fit.

Related comparisons

Fastify vs Django → Tempo vs Grafana → Fastify vs Laravel → Tempo vs Prometheus → Fastify vs Spring Boot → Tempo vs Loki → Fastify vs Flask → Tempo vs Jaeger → Fastify vs Express.js → Tempo vs VictoriaMetrics → Fastify vs Ruby on Rails → Tempo vs Zipkin →

More Comparisons

View Fastify → View Tempo → Search More Tools →

Data source: GitHub API

Last updated: 8/30/2026