Laravel vs Tempo: Key Differences & When to Use Each

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and metrics

Key Differences

Compare Laravel and Tempo across features, pricing, integrations, and community metrics. Laravel / Tempo.

Feature

Laravel

Web Framework

Tempo

Monitoring

Side-by-side comparison of developer tools
PHP web application framework
Distributed tracing backend
GitHub Stars
⭐ 84,170
⭐ 5,232
Contributors
👥 857
👥 299
Pricing
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
Languages
Blade
Go
Features
  • • Framework
  • • Laravel
  • • Php
  • • Distributed Tracing
  • • Grafana
Integrations
No integrations listed
  • • grafana
Momentum Score
66/100 (stable)
89/100 (slowing)
Community Health
57/100 (moderate)
30/100 (needs-attention)
Maturity Index
85/100 (mature)
20/100 (experimental)
Innovation Score
52/100 (evolving)
13/100 (traditional)
Risk Score (higher is safer)
62/100 (low)
29/100 (high)
Developer Experience
36/100 (poor)
16/100 (poor)
Links
🌐 Visit Website View on GitHub
🌐 Visit Website View on GitHub

Laravel Strengths

  • ✓ More popular (84,170 stars)
  • ✓ Larger community (857 contributors)
  • ✓ More features (3 listed)

Tempo Strengths

When to Use Laravel vs Tempo

Use Laravel when its strengths align better with your stack and team needs, and choose Tempo when its ecosystem, integrations, or cost profile is a better fit.

Related comparisons

Laravel vs Django → Tempo vs Grafana → Laravel vs Spring Boot → Tempo vs Prometheus → Laravel vs Flask → Tempo vs Loki → Laravel vs Express.js → Tempo vs Jaeger → Laravel vs Ruby on Rails → Tempo vs Zipkin → Laravel vs Fastify → Tempo vs VictoriaMetrics →

More Comparisons

View Laravel → View Tempo → Search More Tools →

Data source: GitHub API

Last updated: 5/4/2026