Loki vs New Relic: Key Differences & When to Use Each

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and metrics

Key Differences

Compare Loki and New Relic across features, pricing, integrations, and community metrics. Loki / New Relic.

Feature

Loki

Monitoring

New Relic

Monitoring

Side-by-side comparison of developer tools
Like Prometheus, but for logs
New Relic APM agent for Ruby applications
GitHub Stars
⭐ 28,136
⭐ 1,207
Contributors
👥 1,320
👥 305
Pricing
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
Languages
Go
Ruby
Features
  • • Cloudnative
  • • Grafana
  • • Hacktoberfest
  • • Logging
  • • Loki
  • • Agent
  • • Apm Agent
  • • Hacktoberfest
  • • Ruby
Integrations
  • • prometheus
  • • grafana
No integrations listed
Momentum Score
66/100 (stable)
19/100 (stable)
Community Health
77/100 (good)
19/100 (needs-attention)
Maturity Index
67/100 (growing)
15/100 (experimental)
Innovation Score
83/100 (innovative)
16/100 (traditional)
Risk Score (higher is safer)
76/100 (minimal)
29/100 (high)
Developer Experience
54/100 (needs-improvement)
18/100 (poor)
Links
🌐 Visit Website View on GitHub
🌐 Visit Website View on GitHub

Loki Strengths

  • ✓ More popular (28,136 stars)
  • ✓ Larger community (1,320 contributors)
  • ✓ More features (5 listed)

New Relic Strengths

When to Use Loki vs New Relic

Use Loki when its strengths align better with your stack and team needs, and choose New Relic when its ecosystem, integrations, or cost profile is a better fit.

Related comparisons

Loki vs Grafana → New Relic vs Grafana → Loki vs Prometheus → New Relic vs Prometheus → Loki vs Jaeger → New Relic vs Jaeger → Loki vs Zipkin → New Relic vs Zipkin → Loki vs VictoriaMetrics → New Relic vs VictoriaMetrics → Loki vs Thanos → New Relic vs Thanos →

More Comparisons

View Loki → View New Relic → Search More Tools →

Data source: GitHub API

Last updated: 5/4/2026