New Relic vs Tempo: Key Differences & When to Use Each

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and metrics

Key Differences

Compare New Relic and Tempo across features, pricing, integrations, and community metrics. New Relic / Tempo.

Feature

New Relic

Monitoring

Tempo

Monitoring

Side-by-side comparison of developer tools
New Relic APM agent for Ruby applications
Distributed tracing backend
GitHub Stars
⭐ 1,209
⭐ 5,348
Contributors
👥 306
👥 302
Pricing
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
Languages
Ruby
Go
Features
  • • Agent
  • • Apm Agent
  • • Hacktoberfest
  • • Ruby
  • • Distributed Tracing
  • • Grafana
Integrations
No integrations listed
  • • grafana
Momentum Score
23/100 (stable)
83/100 (slowing)
Community Health
20/100 (needs-attention)
30/100 (needs-attention)
Maturity Index
15/100 (experimental)
21/100 (experimental)
Innovation Score
16/100 (traditional)
14/100 (traditional)
Risk Score (higher is safer)
29/100 (high)
29/100 (high)
Developer Experience
19/100 (poor)
16/100 (poor)
Links
🌐 Visit Website View on GitHub
🌐 Visit Website View on GitHub

New Relic Strengths

  • ✓ Larger community (306 contributors)
  • ✓ More features (4 listed)

Tempo Strengths

  • ✓ More popular (5,348 stars)

When to Use New Relic vs Tempo

Use New Relic when its strengths align better with your stack and team needs, and choose Tempo when its ecosystem, integrations, or cost profile is a better fit.

Related comparisons

New Relic vs Grafana → Tempo vs Grafana → New Relic vs Prometheus → Tempo vs Prometheus → New Relic vs Loki → Tempo vs Loki → New Relic vs Jaeger → Tempo vs Jaeger → New Relic vs Zipkin → Tempo vs Zipkin → New Relic vs VictoriaMetrics → Tempo vs VictoriaMetrics →

More Comparisons

View New Relic → View Tempo → Search More Tools →

Data source: GitHub API

Last updated: 7/2/2026